The Kenitra Club: Between the Hammer of Provocation and the Anvil of Success… Who Fears Its Strong Comeback?
As the Kenitra Club writes one of its cleanest chapters in sports and administration, a coordinated campaign has emerged, attempting to drag it into a square of chaos and suspicion. This campaign does not seem innocent and cannot be understood outside its temporal context, especially as it erupts in conjunction with the upcoming electoral events in the city of Kenitra.
Notably, the attack has not stemmed from objective sports criticism or a technical evaluation of performance, but rather from unidentified accounts on social media platforms, operating in a coordinated manner and spreading a hostile discourse directed against the management and its president, Hakim Doumo. Newly established pages, devoid of clear identity, have taken it upon themselves to mobilize public opinion, before the contagion spreads to the stands, inciting minors to chant derogatory slogans and demand resignations.
What is happening is not a mere difference of opinions, but rather a deliberate mobilization. When the stands turn into a platform for settling scores, it becomes a legitimate question: Who funds this? Who pays? And why now?
The numbers alone are sufficient to dismantle the narrative of skeptics. The current management inherited a team burdened with debts, immersed in amateur divisions, and lacking a clear vision. In a short period, it achieved promotion to the second professional division, and today, the team is seriously competing for a ticket to the first professional division. Financially, nearly 80% of the accumulated debts have been settled, a step that restored the club’s balance and institutional dignity. Organizationally, real professional foundations have been laid, with well-studied contracts that have enhanced the team’s competitive capacity.
This upward trajectory has not come about by chance, nor as a result of mere slogans, but through organized administrative work. Thus, the current campaign seems to be a clear attempt to undermine stability at a moment of strength and to disrupt a project that is beginning to bear fruit.
Criticism is a legitimate right, and accountability is necessary, but systematic provocation is something else. When identifiable faces disappear and unknown voices rise, the target becomes clear: it’s not about reforming the club, but rather hitting it.
In such a battle, the real bet lies on the awareness of the fans. Because sporting history is not written with confusion and noise, but through results and fieldwork.
