Radio ExpressTV
Live
For several months, a woman residing in the state of Maryland, United States, has been implicated in a series of alarming actions against Moroccan citizens, including public figures, artists, and journalists. She claims to act under the mandate of a high-ranking Moroccan official—an assertion for which there is no evidence—and has repeatedly engaged in campaigns of defamation, insults, and moral deception. Her conduct exceeds ordinary personal disputes, revealing a deliberate and systematic strategy of harassment.
This woman operates across multiple YouTube channels as well as her own Instagram account, disseminating deliberately defamatory content while projecting an image of authority she does not possess. Among her alleged targets is Moroccan artist Latifa Raâfat, whom she approached under the pretext of managing and enhancing her YouTube channel. She requested the artist’s passport for “administrative validation,” which was subsequently published across several affiliated channels, flagrantly violating the artist’s privacy and legal rights.
She further claims to be the spouse of a high-ranking U.S. official and asserts she is acting on behalf of a Moroccan authority to target public figures. This constructed narrative serves to intimidate her targets and amplify her perceived influence across digital media spaces.
Journalist Najiba Jalal has also been the victim of defamatory attacks, with allegations targeting both her professional and personal life. These attacks go far beyond legitimate criticism, amounting to deliberate attempts to damage reputation and instill fear.
Beyond defamation, this woman reportedly manipulates her victimhood to lodge complaints against YouTubers, exploiting protections intended for real victims of abuse. On multiple occasions, she has made alarming statements during live broadcasts, placing herself in a state of extreme distress to influence audiences and exert pressure on her targets.
This situation raises two critical concerns.
The first is the protection of victims. How can Moroccan citizens defend themselves against an individual operating from abroad, disseminating harmful content on international platforms? Legal remedies must be pursued both domestically and internationally, with meticulous preservation of evidence and professional legal support. Digital platforms themselves must also be held accountable for hosting or amplifying illegal or defamatory content.
The second concern is the welfare of the woman’s child. Exposure to constant digital conflicts, manipulation, and unstable behaviors constitutes a significant risk to the child’s psychological well-being. Authorities in her country of residence must act decisively, ensuring that the child’s rights and safety are not compromised.
This case extends far beyond individual grievances. It exposes the dangers of an unregulated, borderless digital space where defamation and identity manipulation can thrive with near impunity. It underscores the urgent need for robust protective measures for victims and minors alike, and the responsibility of both institutions and digital platforms to uphold human dignity and security.
Silence in the face of such misconduct only serves the perpetrator. It is imperative that law, society, and digital platforms exercise their authority to confront and curtail these practices before further harm occurs.
