Radio ExpressTV
Live
The governor of Kenitra has approved the list of grants for associations, and the municipality is committed to following legal procedures.
In the midst of recent debates surrounding public support for associations in Kenitra, Express TV has obtained precise information confirming that the discussions are based on false claims being circulated for political purposes, far removed from actual facts and legal procedures in place.
According to available information, the process of supporting associations follows a clear and structured path overseen by a selection committee. This committee includes representatives from both the majority and opposition within the council and is responsible for reviewing applications from associations seeking grants, based on specific criteria, before submitting the list of beneficiaries to the municipal council for approval during one of its official sessions.
Regarding the point that sparked the controversy, sources clarified that it pertains to a single association that was initially selected. After the approval of the list, the selection committee found that this association did not meet the three-year experience requirement, which is essential for receiving support. Consequently, the committee communicated with the association, which acknowledged the error in the submitted documents and provided a written commitment to waive its entitlement to the grant.
Following this development, the municipal council sent a revised list to the Kenitra governorate, comprising 37 associations that meet legal requirements. The list was approved by the governor in full compliance with existing procedures, while the process is currently entering its final stages in preparation for the disbursement of grants.
In this context, Express TV sources categorically denied claims of mismanagement or illegal interventions, asserting that the governor of Kenitra applies a strict approach to handling support files and would not approve or endorse any decision or file that does not meet legal and regulatory criteria.
The sources also refuted rumors regarding the resignation of members from the selection committee or their requests for exemption from their duties. The involved parties confirmed in direct communication with the newspaper that these details are inaccurate and that they continue to perform their roles normally.
In conclusion, the ongoing debate about grants for associations in Kenitra lacks precision and is based on misguided interpretations, while the process proceeds in accordance with clear legal guidelines, governed by principles of transparency and institutional respect.
