Hamid Mahdaoui finds himself at the center of a widespread backlash after publicly admitting to his avoidance of a media debate that was set to take place with Moroccan journalist Najiba Jalal on France 24. He justified his withdrawal by labeling her as “notorious.” This stance has perplexed many observers, particularly given his willingness to appear in another discussion with Algerian Mustafa Bounif, known for his antagonistic views towards Morocco and his support for channels that consistently target the territorial integrity of the kingdom.
The growing public reaction has strongly condemned what many perceive as a campaign of “defamation and slander” aimed at journalist Najiba Jalal, asserting that attacking a professional with years of experience cannot be justified under any pretext.
Observers argue that this contradiction demonstrates a “clear duplicity” that undermines professional practice, especially from someone who refuses to define himself as a “YouTuber,” viewing such a label as defamatory, while simultaneously stripping Jalal of her title of “journalist” despite her lengthy career in fieldwork.
Analysts suggest that Mahdaoui’s behavior intensifies the controversy surrounding his discourse, particularly as he has become, according to several insiders, one of the most prominent figures in content characterized by accusations and emotional outbursts, distancing himself from recognized professional standards. They contend that his evasion of an interview under pointed questioning, while readily engaging with figures known for their hostility towards Morocco, raises significant questions about his motivations and editorial direction.
The uproar over this incident reignites the discussion on the responsibility of content creators and their influence on public opinion amidst increasing calls for a clear distinction between journalism founded on professionalism and ethical codes, and sensationalist content that fuels polarization.
