Suspension of Nasri by the Federation Puts Rmili to the Test of Integrity and Responsibility
In an unprecedented decision, the Royal Moroccan Football Federation has suspended Abdellatif Nasri, the Vice President of the Casablanca City Council in charge of sports and culture, from engaging in any sporting activities for three years due to what it described as his involvement in “mismanagement” during football matches. This decision places Nabila Rmili at the center of a political and ethical storm, compelling her to take a firm and clear stance.
Nasri is not just any elected official; he is the primary figure responsible for managing the sports sector in the economic capital, distributing funds to associations and sports teams, and representing the council on sensitive issues related to the city’s sports and cultural image.
Is it logical for him to continue in his position despite the suspension issued by the highest national football authority? Can we trust a person who has been convicted in a case that undermines the credibility of the integrity in sports that the state advocates?
This matter is not merely legal and can be circumvented with formal justifications; it is fundamentally about public responsibility ethics and respecting the aspirations of Casablanca’s residents, who have given their votes to someone who represents them sincerely and honorably. If the concerned official has broken the trust pact in sports, how can he supervise the same sector without being viewed with suspicion?
Rmili, as the primary responsible figure for the city council, is now required to break her silence and make a courageous decision that aligns with the principles of transparency she upholds as a motto for the city’s governance. While no one disputes the importance of legal consultation before taking any step, the ethical stance cannot be delayed; silence in such cases is seen as complicity or weakness, neither of which is suitable for a responsible public institution.
Nasri’s mandate no longer holds political or ethical legitimacy, and Rmili stands at a decisive moment to prove whether she is truly a bearer of a reform project that restores trust to the residents or if she will choose the cost of complicity at the expense of integrity and clarity values.
Casablanca deserves leaders who are up to the challenges, not those embroiled in petty issues that harm the city, its sports, and its citizens.